Judge overturns FERC approval of Williams Cos' $1-B pipeline project (U.S.)
A U.S. appeals court threw out a federal regulator's "arbitrary and capricious" approval of a new $1-B natural gas project running through five mid-Atlantic states and intended to serve 3 MM customers.
Agreeing with six environmental groups and eight U.S. states, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission did not properly address objections to the Regional Energy Access Expansion project planned by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line, a unit of Williams Cos WMB.N.
Circuit Judge J. Michelle Childs wrote for a three-judge panel, whose members were judicially appointed by Democratic presidents, that FERC should have better assessed the risk of significant greenhouse gas emissions, and how the Williams unit might reduce them.
She also said FERC did not properly consider the public interest, citing its failure to adequately review New Jersey laws designed to advance the state's clean energy goals, and whether the state needed more capacity.
Childs pointed to two studies that said current capacity would suffice beyond 2030.
About three-quarters of gas from the proposed project would go to New Jersey customers, with the rest going to Delaware, Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania. The appeals court returned the matter to FERC for "appropriate action."
FERC declined to comment.
Williams said the court erred, but the Tulsa, Oklahoma-based company will address its concerns.
It also said the decision will not delay full implementation of the project, which will help provide "much-needed access to clean and reliable natural gas for consumers in the Northeast."
The environmental groups included the New Jersey Conservation Foundation, Delaware Riverkeeper Network and Sierra Club, and had viewed FERC's approval as a rubber stamp.
Their lawyer, Moneen Nasmith of Earthjustice, said Tuesday's decision "made it clear that FERC's longstanding flawed rationale that private contracts for capacity demonstrate a public need for a gas project is no longer sound."
In opposing FERC, the eight states led by New Jersey and Washington cited their "critical interest" in reducing greenhouse gas pollution and enforcing their clean energy laws.
Circuit Judges Cornelia Pillard and Brad Garcia were also on the appeals court panel. Pillard is an appointee of former President Barack Obama. Childs and Garcia were appointed by President Joe Biden.
The case is New Jersey Conservation Foundation et al v FERC, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-1064.
Related News
Related News
- Japan's Mitsubishi to acquire stake in Petronas LNG plant
- McDermott awarded Rovuma LNG Phase 1 FEED contract in Mozambique
- Wood leads industry project to accelerate CCUS with guidelines for CO2 specifications
- Fincantieri LNG-powered Star Princess launched in Monfalcone
- Picarro launches handheld solution for natural gas leak investigation and closed-loop leak management
- Picarro launches handheld solution for natural gas leak investigation and closed-loop leak management
- Fincantieri LNG-powered Star Princess launched in Monfalcone
- Sonatrach, Saudi Aramco raise prices for LPG by 3%–4% in October
- Amarinth secures $1-MM order of API 610 pumps for Coral North FLNG project in Mozambique
Comments